For a Human-Centered AI

Technology and mental health: to innovate means, first and foremost, to listen

October 23, 2026

Editorial by Anna Genovese, published in the newspaper L’Adige on the occasion of World Mental Health Day, October 10, 2024.

In recent years, we have learned to talk much more openly about mental health. Our emotions, thoughts, and psychological struggles now have a platform they long lacked, and we have become more accustomed to checking in with ourselves—asking how we’re doing, what we’re feeling, and what we need. This is a crucial shift: caring for our mental well-being requires us to recognize and make space for our inner experiences.

At the same time, we are surrounded by digital tools that provide instant access to information, advice, and—increasingly—insights about ourselves and our emotional state. But in a world offering constant answers, how much room is left for us to pause, look inward, and understand what we are actually feeling? The issue isn’t technology itself, but the value and role we choose to give it. We must recognize when we begin to delegate reflections that ought to remain our own, shrinking the space we reserve for self-examination. Finding balance means preserving our ability to pause and form our own perspective first. Seeking outside input can certainly help us see things from a fresh viewpoint, but a risk arises when this external feedback becomes so immediate that it bypasses our inner reflection altogether—when we look for an answer before we’ve even tried to process our own thoughts or emotions.

Artificial intelligence makes this reflection especially timely. We can now ask AI highly personal questions and receive conversational responses in seconds. While this can be a helpful tool, we need to remember that having an answer available doesn’t mean it’s the answer. Technology should support human reflection, not replace it.

However, the burden of finding this balance shouldn’t fall solely on technology users. It also rests on those who research, develop, and design these systems. In our digital health research at FBK, this means putting people before technology: starting with the specific problem at hand, the individuals experiencing it, and their real-world needs. Only then can we evaluate whether—and how—technology can truly help.

Listening to people teaches us that we cannot decide on their behalf what it means to be helped. A solution that works on paper may be hard to use, spark distrust, or fail to address what someone actually cares about. That is why technology for well-being must increasingly be designed with people, not just for them.

The value of lived experience lies at the heart of this year’s World Mental Health Day theme: “Lived experiences heard: real voices, real change.” It reminds us that people living with mental health challenges are more than just listeners—they are experts by experience whose insights should shape the decisions affecting them. In digital health and innovation, we must ensure that people’s experiences and needs guide our designs right from the start.

Ultimately, the challenge isn’t choosing between people and technology, nor is it deciding once and for all whether technology is good or bad for our mental health. Instead, it’s about building a more intentional relationship with the tools embedded in our daily lives—and designing technologies that honor human experiences and voices. Because people always come before technology.


The author/s